Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Optimizing the mind: Brown researchers develop neural model to understand working memory

Researchers said the model could help scientists address symptoms of neurodegenerative diseases and other disorders.

Photo of the Carney Brain Institute offices with navy blue couches, a grey wall and exposed concrete.

The impact of the model could extend beyond theoretical neuroscience and shed insight to working memory deficits seen in diseases like Parkinson’s.

When you try to solve a math problem in your head or remember the things on your grocery list, you’re engaging in a complex neural balancing act — a process that, according to a new study by Brown researchers, isn’t about your memory’s storage capacity, but how efficiently it’s being used.

Researchers created a computer model that simulates the interaction between the thalamus — which assists with short-term memory — and the basal ganglia in the human brain, revealing the strategies that our brain employs to manage and encode sensory information. Researchers on the study told The Herald that despite the theoretical nature of the study, the model could help scientists learn more about neurodegenerative diseases and other disorders.

Researchers compared two models, each containing “stripes” that represented separate storage units. One contained eight stripes, while the other used a streamlined “chunking” method — which merged similar information into an averaged representation — with just two stripes. The study found that the “chunk model was able to efficiently use its stripes and actually outperform the model with eight stripes,” according to Aneri Soni PhD’23, lead author of the study.

Chunking could reduce errors when the brain is overloaded with information, according to Soni.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even though “we have a lot of neurons and the ability to potentially represent many items,” the challenge is in avoiding errors that arise when too many items are present, Soni explained.

The model must not only store information, but also decide how to allocate its limited resources to place data and merge similar items. Sometimes, when the model was tasked with remembering four or five items using only two stripes, it “learned to use one stripe and leave the other empty,” Soni said. 

These decisions dig into the underlying “management problem” of working memory, a challenge that, as Soni notes, sets the stage for further exploration into how these limitations might be addressed in future research.

For her experiment, Soni used the color wheel task, a popular tool in visual working memory studies. In this task, the model is presented with colored bars of varying orientations and later prompted to recall the color associated with particular orientations.

The model “had to correctly associate the color of a bar with its orientation and then maintain that information over a delay,” Soni said. The task allowed her to compare the model’s performance with human behavior data collected by the lab in a previous study.

Inspiration for the model traces back to earlier research by Matt Nassar, an assistant professor of neuroscience and cognitive and psychological sciences, which showed how chunking can work in a computational model but didn’t explore how this could play out in humans.

Michael Frank, director of the Carney Center for Computational Brain Science and principal investigator of the paper, explained that the impact of the model extends far beyond theoretical neuroscience and could shed insight to working memory deficits seen in diseases like Parkinson’s.

These disorders could disrupt this new “chunking” process detailed in the paper “leading to difficulties in filtering out irrelevant information,” he said.

Frank added that the basal ganglia, a critical structure involved in regulating cognitive control, acts as a gatekeeper for information entering working memory. 

“It prevents you from accessing more than just a few items at a time by inhibiting excess input and forcing the system to focus on only a couple of different representations at once,” he explained. The model shows that when this gating process fails, the system becomes overwhelmed by competing signals, making it difficult to manipulate information effectively.

ADVERTISEMENT

Edward Awh, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at the University of Chicago, who has spent over thirty years studying human memory, explained that understanding the neural processes that govern working memory is essential because “the contents of working memory define a hundred percent of your lived existence.”

Despite having an abundance of neurons, he explained, humans are typically limited to holding only three to four items in mind. 

“If we want to understand working memory capacity limits, then the ultimate accomplishment would be to build a concrete neural model of how information is encoded into working memory,” he said, adding that he is “particularly excited” about the model’s focus on efficient resource management.

Awh, who was not involved in the Brown study, noted the clinical relevance of these findings for disorders such as ADHD and schizophrenia. He believes that a concrete model of working memory could guide targeted interventions to help restore cognitive function in affected individuals.

Get The Herald delivered to your inbox daily.

“Anything we can do to learn about the systems that are challenged is going to help us to conceive of new interventions,” he said.



Powered by SNworks Solutions by The State News
All Content © 2025 The Brown Daily Herald, Inc.