To the Editor:
While I strongly, but respectfully, disagree with the editorial pleading for ROTC's reinstatement on campus ("A plea for ROTC's reinstatement," Oct. 20), I do agree that respecting people from different backgrounds is integral to Brown's identity. This is exactly why I do not believe that Brown should reinstate ROTC.
ROTC is a discriminatory, disrespectful institution. Allowing it back on campus sends a message to transgender students that we do not view them as worthy of the same respect as those who possess cisgender privilege. The discriminatory institution of ROTC essentially states that transgender students are inherently flawed, defective human beings who are too damaged to serve their country. While I believe that students should have the opportunity to pursue whatever they choose, I do not believe that this should supersede the right of all Brown students to basic human dignity.
Transgender people are arguably the most marginalized individuals on this campus. Their human rights and dignities are often ignored and pushed aside, even by the most liberal. The debate on this issue begs the question: Would we even be having this conversation if ROTC discriminated against women or people of color? I doubt it.
Personally, I'm glad that President Ruth Simmons takes discrimination against transgender individuals as seriously as she would any other, more prominent minority. Simmons' well-reasoned and noble stance makes me even more proud to be a Brown student.
Kyle Albert '15
