To the Editor:
A recent article ("First-pick contest causes controversy," March 8) mentioned the possibility that the competition will be discontinued. I strongly believe this is unnecessary. As one of this year's entrants, I write to suggest improvements for future years.
Live voting at the screening makes it too easy and tempting to cheat. If this is to be continued, there should be some way to prevent repeat voting. Possible solutions include requiring writing one's Banner ID, or stamping each person's hand after he or she returns the ballot.
Many complaints are about the degree and style of campaigning. While this aspect reflects the competitors' commitment, quality of the video should be the larger determinant. To help retain primary focus on the videos, there could be a requirement for every student to log in and watch the entire video before he or she is provided access to voting on the site, ensuring informed voting. ResCouncil should also establish rules on acceptable vote-getting methods, clearly defining what does and does not constitute as bribery.
As a high turnout is desirable, ResCouncil could publicize the competition more, such as sending a mass e-mail when voting opens. A reasonable incentive to participate could be offered, such as entering all voters in a raffle for Spring Weekend tickets, regardless of which video they chose.
ResCouncil has done well in not overly stringently applying the rules, as they need not be set in stone. However, applied correctly, these proposed rules would help greatly in upholding the spirit of the competition and satisfying the student body. My friends and I greatly enjoyed making our video and attending the screening, as I'm sure did others. The first pick competition, with some improvements, can still serve its purpose well.
Tanya Nguyen '13
March 9
